On that note though, I was a little confused by the characterization of the individual entrepreneur in this text. The author constantly refers to them as "risk-takers", while at the same time discussing how overly emphasized this aspect of entrepreneurship is, that in reality entrepreneurs do whatever they can to mitigate risks. While not perhaps strictly contradictory, I felt as though I was reading a mixed message.
Two questions I would ask:
- Wouldn't the Venture Opportunity school of thought simply fall under the "unique people"category in the Strategic Formulation school?
- When did the term "entrepreneurship" originate? We know that it is derived from the French meaning"to undertake", but when did it actually become a stand-alone term?
Something I disagree with the author on is the notion that entrepreneurship is an acquired skill. In other words, I disagree with with his disagreement on "entrepreneurs are born, not made". I believe there is an element to entrepreneurship that is simply innate, that only people with a certain personality possess. Practice can improve anyone's skill in basically anything, but I also believe that some people are simply born to do certain things (i.e. they are talented). I have friends that will always be better than me at certain things, regardless of the time time spent practiced, and vice versa. I believe this applies to all things actually. There is both learned and innate ability.
No comments:
Post a Comment